& Knowledge

Imagine this, you have started a product company with the most innovative idea and problem statement. You launched it on multiple platforms like Product hunt and Appsumo. You are confident that you will be disrupting the market with this product. However, in 6 months, you are faced with repeated system crashes and performance issues. The root cause? A poorly scaled

Today software development as an industry is going through radical changes. Teams across industries are getting slashed or reviewed as we speak. Few of these impacts cut really deep like this where Google announced layoffs of python teams While this brings a sort of hysteria, it is important to look at this in more balanced terms. We at Interaction labs

A new forecast by Data.ai suggests that global consumer in-app spending is projected to reach $288 billion in 2030 alone, this also means that app downloads will increase exponentially. It is estimated that consumers are set to download nearly 2.9 trillion new apps and games between 2021 and 2030. That’s up 123% from the decade prior. Interestingly the global app

At Interaction Labs, we believe that the more you are exposed to different ways of thinking the more you add value to your client’s projects. It is not only limited to tech, it is also related to how you approach problem solving, build human centered products, how you develop different worldviews and ultimately how you elevate your output. Starting today

Early stage founders often find it hard to choose the right MVP. At Interaction Labs we break down differences between minimum viable vs valuable products. Back in 2001, Frank Robinson was the visionary who first coined and defined the term Minimum Viable Product. It was later popularized by Steve Bank and Eric Reis. At that time there was a tradition